SiaFundyWe review transaction records, assess wallet access issues and organise supporting documents. Receive written findings explaining what the evidence shows, where information is missing and which next steps may be available.
BTC
Bitcoin
—
—
ETH
Ethereum
—
—
SOL
Solana
—
—
BTC—ETH—SOL—
USDC—
XRP—
BNB—BTC—ETH—SOL—USDC—XRP—BNB—Every case starts with the records available.
The proposed service depends on the information you provide and the questions that can reasonably be investigated.
Review transaction IDs, wallet addresses and relevant dates to understand the visible movement of assets across public blockchain records. Findings distinguish recorded activity from assumptions that need further evidence.
Learn MoreReview the circumstances of an access problem and identify the account provider, wallet information or ownership records that may be relevant. Available options depend on the wallet type and the information that remains accessible.
Learn MoreBring transaction records, correspondence and supporting documents into a clear chronology. The agreed report sets out the information reviewed, the findings and any unresolved questions.
Learn MoreOrganise records requested by an account provider or professional adviser, including transaction history and source-of-funds evidence where relevant. The receiving organisation decides whether the information meets its requirements.
Learn MoreDigital asset concerns can involve several platforms, records and counterparties.
SiaFundy's role is to make the available information easier to understand and to document the findings within an agreed scope. A useful review explains both its findings and its limits.
Discuss the scope of your caseThe process starts with the issue and available records, then sets out the proposed work before any review begins.
Missing information, external dependencies, remaining uncertainties and relevant next steps are identified in the written outcome.
Share what happened, when it happened and the relevant transaction references. Never include passwords, private keys, recovery phrases or security codes.
Receive the proposed work, information needed, fee structure and limitations before deciding whether to proceed.
The agreed review uses relevant records and public transaction information, identifying gaps and external dependencies.
Receive the agreed findings or documentation, including records reviewed, uncertainties and relevant next steps.
Know what the review covers and which questions remain outside it.
See which records support a finding and where more information is needed.
Review the fee basis, payment timing and proposed third-party costs before proceeding.
Receive a summary of the outcome and any relevant actions available to you.
Understand the dependencies, uncertainties and limits attached to the findings.
Your written proposal explains the service, its deliverables and the basis of the fee.
It also identifies any proposed third-party costs, when payments fall due and the applicable cancellation or refund terms.
Public blockchain records can show transaction activity, but an address alone does not establish a person's identity or ownership of funds. Findings depend on the quality and completeness of the available evidence.
Tracing a transaction does not reverse it or create access to a wallet. A report does not establish that assets are available for withdrawal.
Any recovery depends on the circumstances and actions by the relevant asset holders, providers or authorities; no outcome is guaranteed.
Describe the issue and the outcome you are seeking. We will consider whether the available information falls within the services we provide.
Understand the information we need, what a review may establish, expected timing, fees and security.
